### Sabrina Carpenter and Franklin the Turtle Publisher Condemn Use of Their Work by Trump Administration Pop singer Sabrina Carpenter and the publisher of the beloved children's character Franklin the Turtle have publicly disavowed the Trump administration's use of their music and imagery to promote its agenda. This condemnation follows the use of Carpenter's song "Juno" in a video montage that depicted U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activities, which Carpenter described as "evil and disgusting" [https://haitigazette.com/sabrina-carpenter-condemns-evil-use-of-her-music-in-white-house-video]. The backlash highlights the intersection of art and politics, particularly when artists feel their work is being misappropriated for controversial purposes. ### Breakdown of the Response to the Controversy 1. **Public Disavowal**: Both Carpenter and the publisher of Franklin the Turtle have issued statements rejecting the use of their work by the Trump administration. 2. **Specifics of the Incident**: Carpenter's song "Juno" was featured in a video that many found objectionable, particularly due to its association with ICE. 3. **Social Media Reaction**: Carpenter took to Twitter to express her outrage, labeling the video as "evil" and urging others not to associate her music with the administration's policies [https://artscanvas.org/arts-culture/sabrina-carpenter-franklin-the-turtle-publisher-condemn-the-trump-administrations-use-of-their-work-on-social-media]. 4. **Cultural Implications**: This incident raises questions about the ethical use of artistic works in political contexts and the responsibilities of artists regarding their creations. ### Supporting Evidence and Data - **Artist's Statement**: Carpenter's tweet explicitly condemning the video has garnered significant attention, emphasizing her strong stance against the administration's actions [https://www.freedom969.com/us-news/sabrina-carpenter-and-franklin-the-turtle-publisher-condemn-trump-administrations-use-of-their-work]. - **Public Backlash**: The use of Carpenter's music in a politically charged context has sparked discussions on social media, with many users supporting her position and criticizing the administration's tactics. - **Historical Context**: This incident is not isolated; it reflects a broader trend where artists and creators are increasingly vocal about how their work is used in political discourse. ### Summary of Findings **Key Conclusions**: 1. **Disavowal of Work**: Sabrina Carpenter and the Franklin the Turtle publisher have firmly rejected the Trump administration's use of their work, highlighting the ethical implications of such actions. 2. **Public Outcry**: Carpenter's strong public statement and the subsequent social media reaction indicate widespread support for her position against the administration's use of her music. 3. **Cultural Reflection**: This controversy serves as a reminder of the ongoing dialogue about the intersection of art and politics, and the responsibilities artists have regarding their creations. In conclusion, the incident involving Sabrina Carpenter and the Trump administration underscores the importance of respecting artists' intentions and the potential consequences of misusing creative works for political agendas [https://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/sabrina-carpenter-franklin-the-turtle-trump-9.7000562].