### Federal Judge Questions Trump's Authority Over California National Guard Deployment - A federal judge has raised significant concerns regarding the Trump administration's authority to maintain command over California National Guard troops, which were initially deployed in response to protests in Los Angeles in June 2025. The judge's skepticism comes amid changing conditions in the area, suggesting that the justification for the ongoing federal control may no longer be valid. California officials are seeking a preliminary injunction to regain control of the troops, arguing that the situation has evolved since their deployment [https://apnews.com/article/national-guard-california-trump-deployment-ff138762b6d3c2cd6da4fe8e4b81b4ce]. ### Legal Proceedings and Arguments Presented 1. **Judge's Skepticism**: U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer expressed doubts about the necessity of the Trump administration's continued command over the National Guard, questioning whether the conditions that warranted their deployment still exist [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/dec/05/california-national-guard-trump-judge]. 2. **California's Request**: California officials have formally requested that the judge issue a preliminary injunction to return control of the National Guard troops to the state, arguing that the ongoing federal oversight is unwarranted [https://www.devdiscourse.com/article/law-order/3721409-judge-questions-legality-of-trumps-control-over-california-national-guard]. 3. **Federal Government's Position**: The Justice Department, represented by Attorney Eric Hamilton, contended that the remaining troops are essential for supporting immigration enforcement operations in Los Angeles [https://apnews.com/article/national-guard-california-trump-deployment-ff138762b6d3c2cd6da4fe8e4b81b4ce]. ### Evidence and Context of the Deployment - **Initial Deployment**: The California National Guard was deployed in June 2025 in response to violent protests, which raised concerns about public safety and order in Los Angeles [https://internationalnewsandviews.com/trump-national-guard-deployment-court-hearing-california-392627-2]. - **Changing Conditions**: Judge Breyer noted that the circumstances in Los Angeles have changed since the initial deployment, implying that the rationale for federal control may no longer be applicable [https://freedom969.com/us-news/federal-judge-appears-skeptical-of-trumps-ongoing-command-of-california-national-guard-troops]. ### Summary of Findings - **Major Conclusion**: The ongoing command of California National Guard troops by the Trump administration is under serious legal scrutiny, with a federal judge questioning the necessity and legality of such control. 1. **Skepticism from the Bench**: Judge Breyer's doubts about the administration's authority highlight a potential shift in the legal landscape regarding federal versus state control of National Guard troops. 2. **California's Legal Action**: The state's request for a preliminary injunction indicates a strong push to reclaim authority over its National Guard, reflecting broader concerns about federal overreach. 3. **Federal Justifications**: The Justice Department's argument for maintaining control focuses on immigration enforcement, but the judge's skepticism suggests that this rationale may not hold up in court. In conclusion, the legal battle over the California National Guard's deployment underscores significant tensions between state and federal powers, with implications for future military and law enforcement operations [https://abc7.com/post/ca-national-guard-donald-trump-gavin-newsom-charles-breyer/18255520].