### Supreme Court to Review Controversial Asylum Policy from Trump Era The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review a contentious immigration policy that was implemented during the Trump administration, which effectively denied migrants the opportunity to apply for asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border until processing space became available. This policy, known as "metering," limited the number of asylum seekers allowed to enter the U.S. at border crossings, forcing many to wait in Mexico. The Court's decision to hear the case comes despite the Trump administration's suspension of the asylum system in January 2025, and it marks a significant moment in the ongoing debate over immigration policy in the United States. The case is set to be argued early next year [https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-asylum-mexico-trump-fd8a994df598731d1647c9df7f949959]. ### Breakdown of the Supreme Court's Review Process 1. **Background of the Policy**: The "metering" policy was established to manage the influx of asylum seekers at the border, allowing only a limited number to enter the U.S. at any given time. 2. **Legal Challenges**: Lower courts have previously ruled against this policy, leading to the Trump administration's appeal to the Supreme Court. 3. **Implications of the Review**: The Supreme Court's decision to review this policy could have significant implications for future asylum seekers and the overall immigration system in the U.S. 4. **Timeline for Arguments**: The case is expected to be argued in early 2026, setting the stage for a pivotal ruling on immigration policy. ### Supporting Evidence and Context - **Policy Details**: The "metering" policy was designed to control the number of asylum applications processed at the border, which critics argue effectively denied access to many vulnerable individuals [https://www.newsday.com/news/nation/supreme-court-asylum-mexico-trump-h68500]. - **Court Rulings**: Previous lower court decisions have struck down the policy, citing its unconstitutionality and the humanitarian implications of denying asylum seekers entry [https://www.adn.com/nation-world/2025/11/17/supreme-court-will-review-an-old-policy-used-to-turn-away-asylum-seekers-at-the-us-border]. - **Political Context**: The review comes at a time when immigration remains a hot-button issue in U.S. politics, with varying opinions on how to handle asylum seekers and border security [https://www.tag24.com/politics/refugees/supreme-court-agrees-to-weigh-in-on-turnback-policy-for-migrant-asylum-claims-3440021]. ### Conclusion and Implications of the Supreme Court's Decision In summary, the Supreme Court's decision to review the "metering" policy represents a critical juncture in U.S. immigration policy. 1. **Potential Outcomes**: The Court's ruling could either uphold the policy, allowing the Trump-era restrictions to remain in place, or strike it down, potentially opening the door for more asylum seekers to enter the U.S. 2. **Impact on Asylum Seekers**: A ruling against the policy would signify a shift towards a more open approach to asylum applications, while a ruling in favor could reinforce stringent immigration controls. 3. **Future Legal Precedents**: This case may set important legal precedents regarding the treatment of asylum seekers and the powers of the executive branch in immigration matters. The implications of this case will resonate beyond the immediate legal context, influencing the broader discourse on immigration in the United States [https://www.wkow.com/news/top-stories/supreme-court-to-review-rescinded-trump-policy-of-turning-away-asylum-seekers-at-the-border/article_13f09fba-3e9d-5652-9598-de5e5f34278a.html].