### US Supreme Court Upholds Controversial Trump Administration Passport Policy for Transgender and Nonbinary Individuals The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in favor of a policy implemented by the Trump administration that restricts transgender and nonbinary individuals from selecting passport gender markers that align with their gender identity. This decision, made on November 6, 2025, allows the enforcement of a rule requiring passports to reflect the sex assigned at birth, effectively blocking the option for individuals to choose 'male,' 'female,' or 'X' as a gender marker. The conservative majority of the court argued that the policy does not constitute discrimination, while the three liberal justices dissented, highlighting the ongoing legal and social battles surrounding LGBTQ+ rights in the United States [https://www.timesnownews.com/world/us/us-news/us-supreme-court-lets-donald-trump-block-transgender-nonbinary-people-from-choosing-gender-on-passports-article-153113692][https://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/us-supreme-court-allows-trumps-passport-policy-targeting-transgender-people]. ### Breakdown of the Supreme Court's Decision and Its Implications 1. **Policy Overview**: The Supreme Court's ruling allows the Trump administration to enforce a policy that mandates passport gender markers to align with biological sex at birth, effectively barring transgender and nonbinary individuals from choosing identifiers that reflect their gender identity [https://www.firstpost.com/world/united-states/us-supreme-court-allows-trump-govt-to-block-different-passport-sex-markers-for-transgender-and-non-binary-people-13948556.html]. 2. **Legal Context**: This decision halts a previous lower court ruling that had required the government to permit individuals to select their gender markers, which included the option 'X' for nonbinary individuals. The Supreme Court's ruling is seen as a significant setback for LGBTQ+ rights [https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/trans-americans-lose-passport-freedom-as-us-supreme-court-backs-trump-policy-101762462577572.html]. 3. **Dissenting Opinions**: The three liberal justices of the Supreme Court expressed their dissent, arguing that the policy is discriminatory and undermines the rights of transgender and nonbinary individuals. Their dissent highlights the ongoing divide within the court regarding issues of gender identity and civil rights [https://www.devdiscourse.com/article/law-order/3688117-supreme-court-upholds-trump-era-passport-gender-policy]. 4. **Political Implications**: This ruling is viewed as a continuation of the Trump administration's broader agenda to roll back protections for LGBTQ+ individuals. It reflects the influence of the conservative majority in the Supreme Court and raises concerns about the future of LGBTQ+ rights in the U.S. [https://www.themirror.com/news/us-news/major-setback-lgbtq-rights-supreme-1490130]. ### Summary of Findings and Future Considerations - **Major Conclusion**: The Supreme Court's decision to uphold the Trump administration's passport policy represents a significant legal and social setback for transgender and nonbinary individuals, reinforcing the requirement for passports to reflect biological sex rather than gender identity. - **Supporting Evidence**: 1. The ruling allows the enforcement of a policy that blocks gender marker choices for transgender and nonbinary individuals [https://www.devdiscourse.com/article/law-order/3688020-supreme-court-greenlights-trumps-passport-policy-for-gender-identification]. 2. The dissent from liberal justices underscores the contentious nature of this ruling and its implications for civil rights [https://www.newsweek.com/supreme-court-passport-lgbt-trump-ketanji-brown-jackson-11006666]. 3. The decision is part of a broader trend of legal challenges to LGBTQ+ rights under the Trump administration [https://www.apnews.com/article/trump-transgender-nonbinary-passport-sex-marker-5040c6412e06a072889af30cfae97462]. - **Next Steps**: As the case continues to be processed in lower courts, the implications of this ruling will likely influence ongoing discussions and legal battles surrounding LGBTQ+ rights in the United States. The ruling may also prompt further advocacy and legal challenges from LGBTQ+ rights organizations [https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-trump-administration-new-passport-policy-x-marker].