### Tensions Rise Over National Guard Control in California Amid Legal Battles The ongoing legal conflict surrounding the deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles has escalated, with significant implications for state and federal authority. California Federal Judge Charles Breyer ruled that President Trump's deployment of troops was unlawful, citing violations of the Posse Comitatus Act and the Tenth Amendment. However, a federal appeals court has temporarily blocked this ruling, allowing the Trump administration to maintain control over the National Guard for the time being. This situation reflects a broader struggle over military authority and civil rights amid heightened tensions surrounding immigration enforcement and protests in California. ### Breakdown of the Current Legal Situation 1. **Initial Ruling by Judge Breyer**: - Judge Charles Breyer ordered the Trump administration to return control of the National Guard to California Governor Gavin Newsom, deeming the deployment illegal [https://www.nydailynews.com/2025/06/15/back-to-the-barracks-judge-takes-apart-trumps-la-deployment]. 2. **Appeals Court Intervention**: - The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a stay on Breyer's ruling, allowing the Trump administration to retain command of the National Guard troops deployed in Los Angeles [https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/12/trump-guard-california-newsom602riya.html]. 3. **Political Reactions**: - Governor Newsom characterized the initial ruling as a necessary check on Trump's authority, while Trump welcomed the appeals court's decision as a means to prevent chaos in the city [https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/12/trump-guard-california-newsom602riya.html]. 4. **Ongoing Legal Proceedings**: - The appeals court's decision is temporary, with further hearings scheduled to review the legality of the National Guard's deployment amid ongoing protests against immigration policies [https://www.devdiscourse.com/article/law-order/3457539-court-halts-trumps-national-guard-deployment-amidst-la-protests]. ### Supporting Evidence and Data - **Key Legal Findings**: - Judge Breyer's ruling highlighted that Trump's actions exceeded his statutory authority and violated constitutional principles, specifically the Tenth Amendment [https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2025-06/12/us-judge-temporarily-bars-trump-from-deploying-national-guard-troops-in-los-angeles]. - **Court Decisions Timeline**: - June 12: Judge Breyer rules against Trump, ordering the return of the National Guard to state control. - June 13: Appeals court temporarily blocks Breyer's ruling, allowing Trump to maintain control [https://www.irishtimes.com/world/us/2025/06/13/appeals-court-allows-trump-to-keep-national-guard-in-los-angeles]. ### Conclusion: A Constitutional Showdown The legal battle over the National Guard's deployment in California underscores a significant constitutional conflict between state and federal powers. 1. **Immediate Outcome**: The appeals court's stay allows Trump to keep the National Guard in Los Angeles, despite the initial ruling deeming the deployment unlawful. 2. **Future Implications**: The ongoing legal proceedings will determine the extent of federal authority in state matters, particularly concerning military deployment during civil unrest. 3. **Political Ramifications**: This case highlights the contentious relationship between state leadership and federal authority, particularly in the context of immigration enforcement and civil rights. The situation remains fluid, with further court decisions expected to shape the future of military involvement in domestic affairs [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-06-13/trump-must-pull-back-on-using-troops-in-la-protests-judge-says].